Week in Review: Hawkish Fed and Bank Jitters

Hawkish testimony from US Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell earlier in the week and strong job openings in the U.S. saw major global indices retreat over the week. 

Federal Reserve Chair Jerome Powell testified before a House Financial Services hearing indicating that interest rates may need to go higher and remain in a restrictive territory for an extended period. The higher for longer approach saw expectations of the feds fund rate increase with the peak or terminal rate now close to 5,75%. 

Friday’s job report which showed an increase of 311,000 nonfarm jobs in February, well above consensus expectations of around 200,000, added to the Fed’s higher for longer interest rate path. The unemployment rate rose unexpectedly, however, from a January five-decade low of 3.4% to 3.6%. There also was some good news on the inflation side, as average hourly earnings rose 4.6% from a year ago, below the estimate for 4.8%. Leisure and hospitality, retail and government led job creation by sector. January’s nonfarm payrolls gain of 517,000 was revised down to 504,000, while December’s total was also revised down to 239,000, a decrease of 21,000 from the previous estimate.

All eyes will now be on next Tuesdays U.S. consumer price data, ahead of the Fed’s 22 March rate-setting meeting, to see whether there is enough evidence of easing inflation pressures to convince the Fed to raise rates by 0.25% rather than 0.5%.

Financials led the declines within the S&P 500 with concerns growing throughout the week about the health of SVB Financial, or Silicon Valley Bank, with customers withdrawing $42 billion of deposits by the end of Thursday. The collapse started on Wednesday when the technology-oriented regional bank was forced to sell and realize losses in securities held on its balance sheet in order to meet capital requirements. Within 48 hours a run-on deposits caused SVB to be shuttered by regulators, with trading in SVB stock halted on Friday. SVB is the largest banking failure in U.S. since the 2008 financial crisis and the second largest ever. The U.S. banking system, following a prolonged period of stringent oversight in the aftermath of the Global Financial Crisis, appears to be significantly better capitalized than it was in past crises, including 2008, but nevertheless the failure sent ripples through the global financial system on growing concerns that the aggressive Fed tightening cycle may be beginning to have undesirable economic side effects.

Major U.S. indices ended the week sharply lower with the benchmark S&P 500 Index down 4.5%, the Dow Jones off 4.4% and the Nasdaq off 4.7% as risk off sentiment took hold.

In the U.K. the economy grew by 0.3% in January, official figures showed on Friday, exceeding expectations as it continues to fend off an inevitable recession. The U.K. remains the only country in the G-7 (Group of Seven) major economies that has yet to fully recover its lost output during the Covid-19 pandemic. On the inflation front, U.K. inflation slowed to an annual 10.1% in January, continuing to shrink after hitting a 41-year high of 11.1% in October but staying well above the Bank of England’s 2% target. The UK’s FTSE 100 Index lost 2.50% for the week.

In Europe, shares tracked global markets lower amid concerns of risks in the banking system, the pan-European STOXX Europe 50 Index ended the week 1.5% lower.

Earlier in the week Beijing set an economic growth target of around 5% this year at the National People Congress (NPC). On Friday Chinese leader Xi Jinping gained an unprecedented third term as president as was widely expected, delegates also formally reappointed Xi as chairman of the Central Military Commission. Signs of weakening demand and a lower than expected growth outlook saw the Shanghai Stock Exchange Index decline by 2.95%, the worst weekly loss in more than two months.

Japan’s stock markets registered modest gains for the week, with the Nikkei 225 Index rising 0.78%, as the Bank of Japan made no changes to its monetary policy at the final meeting chaired by outgoing Governor Haruhiko Kuroda.

Bitcoin fell below $20,000 on Friday hitting a near-two month low after a sell-off in risk assets and the collapse of Silvergate, a crypto-focused bank, which announced it would wind down operations due to the fallout from the implosion of FTX, also weighing on crypto prices.

Market Moves of the Week:

On Monday night South African President Cyril Ramaphosa announced his much anticipated cabinet reshuffle. Paul Mashatile, newly elected deputy president of the ANC was installed as deputy president of South Africa, as was widely expected. A new minister of electricity was announced, Kgosientso Ramokgopa, the former mayor of Tshwane. Ramokgopa has been tasked with ending rolling blackouts by overseeing the fix on Eskom and bringing new energy to the grid. South Africa suffered its worst power cuts in 2022, and 2023 is so far looking even darker.

The South African economy contracted more than expected in the last quarter of 2022, as an escalation in rolling power cuts contributed to most sectors from agriculture to mining shrinking. Figures from Statistics South Africa showed gross domestic product contracted 1.3% in the fourth quarter compared to the previous three months in seasonally-adjusted terms. Analysts had predicted a 0.4% contraction in the October-December period. GDP growth increased by 2.0% in 2022.

Rating agency, S&P Global on Wednesday downgraded its outlook on South Africa to “stable” from “positive”, citing infrastructure constraints and the severe power crisis. It also revised down its real GDP growth forecast for 2023 to 1% from 1,5% previously.

The JSE All-Share Index tracked global markets lower for the week. Resources (-4.05%) were sharply lower, followed by financials (-1.89%) and industrials (-1.57%). The rand gained the most in more than a month on Friday after the US dollar weakened as US jobs data came in stronger-than-expected but lower than in January, ending the week approximately 1% stronger at R18.33/$.

Chart of the Week:

Following testimony from Fed Chair Jerome Powell the predicted feds fund rate moved higher, pointing to a higher terminal rate (using the Bloomberg World Interest Rate Probabilities function). This implied policy rate contrasts sharply with Powell’s last press conference on Feb. 1st .

Week in Review: US Inflation Falls

In June, spending at US retailers continued its positive growth trend for the third consecutive month, showcasing resilience among American consumers. According to the Commerce Department’s report on…

Continue reading

Embracing Your Simplexity

Beautiful Lorelei

In life, very few things are simple. Simplicity fools us and taunts us as we stumble through a complex world. Simplicity is the irresistible Lorelei enchantingly singing to us from the shore across the river. The Lorelei that will look on uncompassionately as our boats crash against the rocks as we try to reach simplicity that lies on the other side of complexity.

Jeffrey Kluger beautifully illustrates how simplicity misleads us on so many fronts in our modern lives in his book Simplexity – the simple rules of a complex world – and invites us to consider a different approach – Simplexity.

I echo his plea from my area of specialisation.

The Modern Fallacy

There seems to be a growing chorus of financial and fiduciary service providers enchanting the masses to solve all their estate planning issues by simply doing a will. Don’t get me wrong, having a will is important and reviewing your will should be a two-yearly habit. Some wills are very simple and there is no need for massive estate planning to be done.

But this is where simplicity fools us.

Any will that is drafted for any person should be the result of some form of estate planning. Estate planning can only be done if you understand the data that underpins your planning and the legal environment in which you live, or in which the assets exist.

The will itself, is the final step of a planning process and the fact that the will is simple means that the complexity has been absorbed to find the simple answer or the simple will at the other end of complexity.

Data Matters

All estate planning processes should start with knowing what you own and who you owe. This is critical in understanding what you will leave behind and what is available to distribute to heirs. For example:

  • Debt is repaid before we even consider your bequests.
  • Debt could include loans being called up for you stood surety.
  • Obligations like estate duty, income tax, capital gains tax, administration costs and transfer duty are also payable before the heirs receive their inheritance.
  • Your marital obligations rank higher than the rights of your heirs.
  • Maintenance claims also trumps bequests.

Considering these data-points and collating the information will have greater value in the process of transferring your wealth than a “simple” will.

A will that does not consider these data points is worse than dying intestate (which means – without a will). In other words, a will that is badly drafted or drafted without considering the assets, liabilities and obligations is worse than not having one.

Planning Matters More

The will you sign is the final step of a planning process. In this planning process you (or your advisor) should not guess the law, nor guess the maths.

In our environment we collate all the data points, map them in our software and then do proper planning based on the data that have been provided. This allows us to simulate the death scenarios and put the will to the test. It also allows us to amend the plan as the data changes over time.

Peace of mind lies in the fact that someone has recorded the data points, knows where everything is and will be able to execute the wishes in the will easily and effectively. More than 90% of delays in the administration of a deceased estates are avoidable by collating the data and basing the planning on the data.

Execution Follows

The execution of the planning is only the third step in the process. This is where the will drafting comes in. If you find simplicity at this juncture – great. If not, we might have to absorb some more complexity.

 

A few things come to mind that require more planning:
 

  • Liquidity shortfalls in the estate. If there is not enough cash to pay what needs to be paid, assets that were planned to go to legatees might have to be sold. This is obviously a problem that requires a solution. The solution is not always taking our more life cover – its only one option and then the life cover should be taken out correctly.
  • Exposure to death taxes and taxes on death sometimes create the liquidity problem but could be avoided through the diligent use of trusts. Execution of the plan therefore might include creating a trust.
  • Assets located in other countries might require a deeper dive into the legal environment of those jurisdictions. In some cases, a second will might be required or the structure in which the asset is held might have to be changed.
  • Heirs who are minors or who live in other countries often requires special planning. For minors you need to have a clear understanding about their personal well being (who they will stay with) and their financial well-being (who will look after their money). The age and the whereabouts of heirs are important data points.

Adaptation Should be a Constant

The fact that things around us are in a constant state of change, is a complication. A plan or a will that works today, might not work in three years’ time. There are so many data points that change over time:

  • We buy assets and we sell assets.
  • We repay debts or make additional debts.
  • Heirs pass away and heirs are born.
  • Minor children become majors.
  • People become independent from us or become dependent on us.
  • We divorce and remarry or get married.
  • Tax law and taxation rates change.
  • We change advisors, or advisors move on to other businesses.

By pinning down the data-points, we will become aware of what is changing. By knowing what is changing we will be drawn into reviewing the plans. Reviewing the plans would result in updating that simple will to another simple will that now reads slightly differently.

Let’s rather find the simplicity at the other end of complexity together. Let’s embrace our simplexity and shield our ears from the enchantment of the simplicity industry.

Written by Louis Venter, Fiduciary Specialist at Carrick Consult